Some SEO tips from the Web Copywriter are hopefully going to lift the Google Search Ranking of a UK company that turns photos into Personalised Pop Art on canvas.

Which bits did the SEO guy optimise exactly?

Email Marketing leads to SEO opportunity

I recently sent out a Web Copywriter email update and heard back from a mate I used to play tennis with when I lived in Brighton, UK. Dave – who’s worked for some of London’s top design consultancies – had just created a website and invited me to take a look.

UK Personalised Pop Art firm, Photo2Art's website - Before

Personalised Art – turning photos into pop art portraits on canvas

His business is called Photo2Art and the idea is that they turn your photos into Andy Warhol-inspired pop art portraits on canvas. A cute idea but they’re not the only ones doing it and they need to distinguish themselves from firms that just print your photos onto canvas. Unfortunately, even though he’d employed a web copywriter (rather than The Web Copywriter) and an SEO guy, site traffic had been poor, and conversions had been low. What was the problem?

No evidence of SEO

The site had a Google PageRank of 3/10 which wasn’t bad but it showed no evidence of being optimised at all. It had poor (and repetitive) meta page titles, few relevant h tags, no highlighting and no terms being emphasised. I was left thinking, “Which bits did the SEO guy optimise exactly?”.

Why Keyword Analysis Tools need to be used with discretion

I asked to look at the SEO guy’s keyword analysis and discovered that they’d recommended “unusual gifts” as the best keyword for this business. Why? Because their Keyword tool said it had the highest Keyword Effectiveness Index (KEI).

KEI is a measure that you’ll use in SEO to try to unearth a niche keyword but it needs to be used with discretion. How many people who are looking for “unusual gifts” will want this offering? How many will you actually convert? Meanwhile, you have failed to optimise for the keywords that would attract people who are actually looking to convert their photos into personalised pop art portraits on convas.

Revisiting Keyword Analysis

I used Wordtracker with its UK database option to identify a bunch of keywords that are popular in this category and was surprised at the results.

1. “personalised pop art”
2. “personalised art”
3. “personalised wall art”
4. “personalized wall art”
5. “personalised pop art portrait”

Who would have thought that “personalised pop art” would be the most popular – for a factor of almost two.
“Pop art portraits” and “pop art canvas” were also rated highly.

“Photos on canvas” was searched for much more frequently than any of these – but it’s too broad and too competitive. You get those people who just want to put their photos on canvas and you’re competing in a very crowded and better resourced market.

But before making any recommendations, I wanted to see what Dave’s competitors were doing?

Which keywords? Look at your competitors

Dave had identified the number one competitor as You Are Art so I checked out their site and guess what I found? They were optimising for the terms that Wordtracker had identified. What’s more, Google ranked them #1 for these terms. Clearly they must be the right terms. But could Dave’s firm hope to compete?

Can you compete for the prime keywords?

This competitor only had a Google PageRank of 3/10 – the same as Dave – and its page titles weren’t as good as they could be. Other competitors who were ranked highly also weren’t too intimidating. So I recommended that Dave optimise for these keywords and rattled off some meta tags at very affordable rates (ie free). But I didn’t stop there.

Domain names – .co.uk vs .net and usability

Dave’s domain name – www.photo2Art.net – was problematic. Firstly, it’s a .net domain, which means that when people in the UK look at a Google search results page, they can’t be sure whether it’s a UK firm or not. Secondly, if people have been to the site, when they come back – assuming they remember your name – they are more likely to go to photo2art.co.uk than photo2art.net. I sure did.

A keyword optimised domain name

It’s always a good idea to try to have a domain name that includes keywords – particularly if you are first and foremost an online business. While www.personalisedart.co.uk and www.personalised-art.co.uk were both taken, www.personalisedpopart.co.uk was not. So the domain name with the most searched for keyword phrase in the category was available. Fabulous. They bought that. But I made a further recommendation.

Domain name usability and defending your turf

I said they should also buy www.personalised-pop-art.co.uk for three reasons. Firstly, Google will rank more highly a domain that has words delineated. So it will prefer www.personalised-pop-art.co.uk over www.personalisedpopart.co.uk.

Secondly, it’s easier to read on a Google Search Results page. People can look at it and at a glance see exactly that it is “personalised-pop-art” whereas “personalisedpopart” is much harder to discern and can be read as “personalised po part” amongst others.

The final reason is a defensive move. Because it’s a better domain name, you don’t want anyone else to get it.

So I recommended they set up the site as www.personalised-pop-art.co.uk. However. when they tell people where to go, they should say “personalisedpopart.co.uk” because it’s easier to remember. They then redirect all traffic from www.personalisedpopart.co.uk to www.personalised-pop-art.co.uk.

But – and this is a very big but – I said they MUST use a 301 Permanent Redirect from all their old pages to their new ones. This way they get the advantage of the SEO improvements while preserving their existing PageRank.

Practise what you preach

I do this with my own Web Copywriter domains. I own web-copywriter.com.au and the site is set up there, but I also own webcopywriter.com.au and I use this for my email address because it’s easier to type in and remember. I also own thewebcopywriter.com.au. Domain names are partly about SEO, partly about usability and partly about keeping your competitors at bay.

Beyond SEO

I have also recommended that Dave rejig his information architecture (IA) and website copywriting to make it clearer, cleaner and more action-oriented. I wanted him to implement Persuasive Architecture. This means guiding people through your site step by step, massaging them past all of their psychological barriers in turn until they WANT to press that order button. But this will have to wait – and I might have to get him to part with a few sheckels for that.

I also said that link building was important and that they should get themselves listed on a reputable gifting website. Those inbound links from high ranking sites are gold.

Watch this space

The recommendations are in. Let’s see how they go. I’ll keep you posted.

Americans and Australians have a different vocabulary. It’s not ‘petrol’, it’s ‘gas’. It’s not ‘takeaway’, it’s ‘to go’. It’s not an ‘invasion’ of Iraq, it’s a ‘liberation’.

Everything I’d read said that Wordtracker was the Keyword Analysis tool of choice for the serious SEO professional. But there are two reasons why it’s of limited value to local Search Engine Optimisation operators – the relevance of its data, and its very ordinary usability.

Is Wordtracker all it’s cracked up to be?

Most US SEO professionals will tell you that Wordtracker is the best keyword analysis tool on the market. Peter Kent says it – though he acknowledges a commercial relationship with them. But he’s not alone. So I left the comfort of Google’s keyword tools and explored Wordtracker but was totally underwhelmed.

Wordtracker’s woeful usability

The first thing that will strike any self-respecting SEO professional is just what a naff site Wordtracker is. It looks old and dated. But, worse than that, its interface is not intuitive – to say the least – and it just doesn’t let you do what you want to do.

Control over the keywords you choose

Wordtracker’s strength is that it really does throw up an awful lot of keyword suggestions. In an increasingly crowded market where everyone is looking to carve out a keyword niche, this is pretty useful. However, what I’ve found is that it’s far too hard to control what you include and exclude. And then you’ve got to export the data for inclusion in an SEM campaign. But, its failings are more fundamental than that.

Wordtracker tells you what Americans search for

The whole purpose of doing Keyword Analysis is to identify what your customers are searching for when they come onto the net. Now, while Wordtracker might tell you what US customers search for on the net, there is no guarantee that Australian users search for the same terms.

For Australian SEO work you need Australian search data

You may have noticed that Americans and Australians talk differently. It’s not just the difference in accents. We have a different vocabulary – in almost everything. It’s not petrol, it’s gas. It’s not takeaway, it’s “to go”. It’s not an invasion of Iraq, it’s a liberation. This different use of language is going to have serious consequences in Keyword Analysis. So, American-dominated data is of limited value – unless you have a global market. If your market is Australian, you need Australian data.

Why I prefer to use Google’s keyword tools

I still use Wordtracker – hell, I’ve paid the hefty annual subscription so I’m going to get my money’s worth. But my two preferred tools are both by Google – and not just because they are free. Google’s Keyword Tool and its Traffic Estimator have the huge fundamental advantage over Wordtracker that you can look at purely Australian results. Or purely NSW results. Or purely Sydney results. And know much more accurately what your customers are looking for.